2013 Sep 16 TCS3 Engineering (Denault, Connelley, Griep) Goals TCS3 pointing run. This run was done during the hexapod engineering. This is the 1st night the hexapod was installed. Using tcs software V130808. 1. Encoder Measurement Not Done 2. benchmark1 Not Done.. Did later See item #4. 3. Take Pointing Data Starting about 9:30pm goto zenith, stop, ape.set.pmac. filename: pointing.dat Pattern: Grid Sep: 13 (gives 70 starts). Dave finished taking data at 10:45 (it took 1:15 ) At zenith ape - encoder is: -38.9 2.6 tpoint file: pointing.dat .ape file: pointing.ape Used tpoint to get new coefficients: tpoint RMS is 5883 Deleted the following points: 7, 8, 64, 69, 70. used test.dat Sky RMS = 13.57 Will used these values. pointing.ps pointing.pdf - tpoint graphs (postscript and PDF) pointing_coeff.txt - resulting coefficients. Sky RMS = 13.57 Updated .tcs-init with new coefficients # coefficients from 2013/09/16 pointing run: IH +72.3738 ID -114.6424 NP -5.1980 CH -54.8530 ME -5.9050 MA +20.2056 HCES +27.4960 HCEC -53.7381 DCES -474.0696 DCEC +113.4251 FO +25.9815 TF +4.6044 TX -53.3207 4. benchmark1 Since the fit was bad, did a benchmark #1 goto zenith, stop, ape.set.pmac. filename: b1.dat Pattern: benchmark13 tpoint file: b1.dat .ape file: b1.ape 5. benchmark2 Loaded new pointing surface. goto zenith, stop, ape.set.pmac. filename: b2.dat Pattern: benchmark13 tpoint file: b2.dat .ape file: b2.ape 6. b1 vs b2 Now, let's compare the 2 benchmarks: Here is a graph of HA error of b1.dat vs b2.dat gnuplot to make the graphs: plot 'b1.ape' using 10 with linespoints title 'b1 HA pt.madj' replot 'b2.ape' using 10 with linespoints title 'b2 HA pt.madj' Here is a graph of DEC error of b1.dat vs b2.dat gnuplot to make the graphs: plot 'b1.ape' using 11 with linespoints title 'b1 Dec pt.madj' replot 'b2.ape' using 11 with linespoints title 'b2 Dec pt.madj' New coefficients look better that the old one. Will keep the new pointing coefficients.