From: "Peter Onaka" Date: Apr 2, 2013 8:47 AM Subject: iSHELL review feedback To: "Donald N.B. Hall" Cc: "Jay Elias" , "Alan Tokunaga" , "Randy Chung" , "Doug Toomey" , "Mike Mumma" , "David Warren" , "Klaus Hodapp" , "Dan Jaffe" , "John Rayner" , "Eric Warmbier" , "Darryl Watanabe" , "Ken Cheung" Hi All, Sending out a quick write up: Issues: ========= 1. Suggest an operational lifetime be defined in the "Facility Requirements" section of the SRD. This will help define a flow down requirement for equipment spares. 2. A spares policy should be defined and cost budgeted to make sure technology that will leave the market (PCIe, parallel ports) will be supported throughout the instrument lifetime. 3. Disabling the Kaman displacement position sensor emitter during detector readouts will require an RF (preferably terminated with an appropriate load) cutoff. This cutoff should be placed as close to the control electronics and as far away from the cryostat as the sensor wiring will allow. Kaman transmission frequencies appear to be in the 500Khz to 1Mhz range and will couple to the detector wiring.... 4. If it does not require too much effort, the option to have the detector controller readouts interleaved (or the slit guider held off) should be implemented. The typical IRTF mechanical development *does not* include the detector (and all sensor) wiring paths in the 3D model. Also, as illustrated in the Instrument Controller block diagram, the system power supplies are co-located in the cooled racks at the MIM (we have seen sub-read noise, intermittent pattern noise on other multi detector instruments with decent physical separation between the detetctors). The IRTF has been able to achieve good noise performance with multiple detector instruments before, but component and cabling shielding, routing and design has always been critical. The cryogenic ribbon cabling is not shielded. Historically, the final actual wiring was done by the instrument technical (with guidance from the electronic engineer). If this option is not supported then the 3D mechanical model should include all the detector and sensor wiring. Discussion: =========== 1. What are the H2RG cable length differences between NSFCAM2 and ISHELL? 2. How is the GPS timestamp requirement of 1usec going to be implemented? Comments: ========== 1. The IRTF approach of strict minimization powered devices in the cryostat when doing detector readouts should be maintained. 2. The thermal shielding on the Phytron motors should be developed/reviewed. Regards, -- Peter Onaka Institute for Astronomy tel 808-956-7747 onaka@ifa.hawaii.edu